Goldfeder v. Queens County Savings Bank

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldfeder v. Queens County Savings Bank

113 Misc. 2d 649, 453 N.Y.S.2d 130, 1982 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3355

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided January 12, 1982·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order and judgment in favor of plaintiff unanimously reversed, without costs, judgment vacated and motion denied. Order denying defendant’s motion unanimously reversed, with $10 costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed.

In view of the unconditional terms contained in the separation agreement, signed by plaintiff and incorporated by reference into the judgment of divorce, plaintiff has failed to demonstrate any right, title or interest to the [650]*650bank account in question and has failed to set forth a viable claim for damage as a result of the actions of the bank.

Buschmann, J. P., Jones and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order and judgment in favor of plaintiff unanimously reversed, without costs, judgment vacated and motion denied. Order denying defendant’s motion unanimously reversed, with $10 costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed.

In view of the unconditional terms contained in the separation agreement, signed by plaintiff and incorporated by reference into the judgment of divorce, plaintiff has failed to demonstrate any right, title or interest to the [650]*650bank account in question and has failed to set forth a viable claim for damage as a result of the actions of the bank.

Buschmann, J. P., Jones and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Goldfeder v. Queens County Savings Bank, 113 Misc. 2d 649, 453 N.Y.S.2d 130, 1982 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3355 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

113 Misc. 2d 649 (Goldfeder v. Queens County Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related