Goldfarb v. State

502 So. 2d 102, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 559, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6824
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 18, 1987
DocketNo. 4-86-1080
StatusPublished

This text of 502 So. 2d 102 (Goldfarb v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldfarb v. State, 502 So. 2d 102, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 559, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6824 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. We note that appellant pled not guilty. Therefore we remand this cause to the trial court with instructions to correct the order granting probation and fixing terms thereof to show appellant was found guilty by a jury.

AFFIRMED but REMANDED.

HERSEY, C.J., and DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
502 So. 2d 102, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 559, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldfarb-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.