Goldfarb v. Kohn
This text of 240 A.D. 844 (Goldfarb v. Kohn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion to remove action from Municipal Court to Supreme Court affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to a new motion presenting more fully the nature and extent of the injuries, the damages suffered by way of expense incurred, loss of earnings or services and the like, indicating that a verdict will in all likelihood exceed the amount, to which the jurisdiction of the Municipal Court is limited. On this motion the plaintiff Frances Goldfarb’s claim to increased damages depends upon [845]*845speculation and opinion, not based on sufficient facts. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Seudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
240 A.D. 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldfarb-v-kohn-nyappdiv-1933.