Goldfarb v. Hudson
421 N.E.2d 119, 53 N.Y.2d 654, 438 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2315
This text of 421 N.E.2d 119 (Goldfarb v. Hudson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Goldfarb v. Hudson, 421 N.E.2d 119, 53 N.Y.2d 654, 438 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2315 (N.Y. 1981).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (75 AD2d 775). Appellant tendered no evidentiary proof in admissible form showing facts sufficient to require a trial.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
421 N.E.2d 119, 53 N.Y.2d 654, 438 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldfarb-v-hudson-ny-1981.