Goldfarb v. Blue Cross Blue Shield

79 A.D.2d 908, 437 N.Y.S.2d 917, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9770

This text of 79 A.D.2d 908 (Goldfarb v. Blue Cross Blue Shield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldfarb v. Blue Cross Blue Shield, 79 A.D.2d 908, 437 N.Y.S.2d 917, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9770 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

Order, Appellate Term, First Department, entered on February 8, 1980, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment granted on constraint of Danzig v Dikman (78 AD2d 303). The parties are directed to settle an order and, in the event of their inability so to do, the matter is remanded to the Special Term of Civil Court for the entry of an appropriate order in accordance herewith. Settle order. Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Sandler, Markewich, Silverman and Bloom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Danzig v. Dikman
78 A.D.2d 303 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 A.D.2d 908, 437 N.Y.S.2d 917, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldfarb-v-blue-cross-blue-shield-nyappdiv-1981.