Golder & McCarthy v. Butler

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Golder & McCarthy v. Butler

82 A. 1132, 108 Me. 557, 1911 Me. LEXIS 134

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 14, 1911·Published

Opinion

Assumpsit on an account annexed to recover for groceries delivered to the family of Charles Butler, the son of the defendant. Plea, the general issue. Verdict for plaintiffs for $76.49. Defendant moved for a new trial. The issue involved in this case was one of fact only. The rescript says: "The facts and testimony, as well as the circumstances, so strongly negative the plaintiffs’ claim of an original promise that the verdict should not be allowed to stand.”

Motion sustained. Verdict set aside.

McGillicuddy & Morey, for plaintiffs. W. IL Judkins, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Assumpsit on an account annexed to recover for groceries delivered to the family of Charles Butler, the son of the defendant. Plea, the general issue. Verdict for plaintiffs for $76.49. Defendant moved for a new trial. The issue involved in this case was one of fact only. The rescript says: "The facts and testimony, as well as the circumstances, so strongly negative the plaintiffs’ claim of an original promise that the verdict should not be allowed to stand.”

Motion sustained. Verdict set aside.

McGillicuddy & Morey, for plaintiffs. W. IL Judkins, for defendant.

Golder & McCarthy v. Butler, 82 A. 1132, 108 Me. 557, 1911 Me. LEXIS 134 (Me. 1911).

Pincite

82 A. 1132 (Golder & McCarthy v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.