Goldenberg v. Goldenberg

New York Court of Appeals

Goldenberg v. Goldenberg

226 N.E.2d 185, 19 N.Y.2d 759, 279 N.Y.S.2d 359, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1635

New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 6, 1967·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Schneider v. Schneider (17 N Y 2d 123). The question of whether the prior judgment in the arbitration confirmation proceeding was conclusive of the issue in the instant simplified procedure action was not properly before the court as defendant had not raised the affirmative defense before appeal.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Yoobhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating and Breitel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Schneider v. Schneider (17 N Y 2d 123). The question of whether the prior judgment in the arbitration confirmation proceeding was conclusive of the issue in the instant simplified procedure action was not properly before the court as defendant had not raised the affirmative defense before appeal.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Yoobhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating and Breitel.

Goldenberg v. Goldenberg, 226 N.E.2d 185, 19 N.Y.2d 759, 279 N.Y.S.2d 359, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1635 (N.Y. 1967).

Pincite

226 N.E.2d 185 (Goldenberg v. Goldenberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related