Goldenberg v. Goldenberg

New York Court of Appeals

Goldenberg v. Goldenberg

226 N.E.2d 185, 19 N.Y.2d 759, 279 N.Y.S.2d 359, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1635

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 6, 1967

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 226 N.E.2d 185 (Goldenberg v. Goldenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldenberg v. Goldenberg, 226 N.E.2d 185, 19 N.Y.2d 759, 279 N.Y.S.2d 359, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1635 (N.Y. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Schneider v. Schneider (17 N Y 2d 123). The question of whether the prior judgment in the arbitration confirmation proceeding was conclusive of the issue in the instant simplified procedure action was not properly before the court as defendant had not raised the affirmative defense before appeal.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Yoobhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating and Breitel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Schneider v. Schneider (17 N Y 2d 123). The question of whether the prior judgment in the arbitration confirmation proceeding was conclusive of the issue in the instant simplified procedure action was not properly before the court as defendant had not raised the affirmative defense before appeal.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Yoobhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating and Breitel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

226 N.E.2d 185, 19 N.Y.2d 759, 279 N.Y.S.2d 359, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldenberg-v-goldenberg-ny-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack