Goldenberg v. Doscher
This text of 221 A.D. 869 (Goldenberg v. Doscher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed upon tbe law and tbe facts, with costs to appellant, and judgment directed in appellant’s favor for tbe rebef demanded, with costs, upon authority of Warner v. Doscher (213 App. Div. 117; affd., 241 N. Y. 605). Findings of fact proposed by plaintiff numbered II, VI, VIII, IX, X, XI, XII and XIII, and conclusions of law proposed by plaintiff numbered I and II, are found. Findings of fact and conclusions of law as made at tbe Special Term, and which are inconsistent herewith, are reversed. Kelly, P. J., Manning, Young, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
221 A.D. 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldenberg-v-doscher-nyappdiv-1927.