Golden v. Wickhardt Co.
33 A.D.2d 652, 305 N.Y.S.2d 203, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2950
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 30, 1969·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Order unanimously reversed, without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Plaintiffs should be given an opportunity through disclosure to obtain facts essential to support their opposition to the motion for summary judgment. (CPLR 3212, subd. [f]; cf. Potter Real Estate Co. v. O & S Bearing & Mfg. Co., 32 A D 2d 883.) (Appeal from order of Onondaga Special Term granting motion for summary judgment in action for damages for trespass.) Present — Marsh, J. P., Gabrielli, Moule, Bastow and Henry, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Golden v. Wickhardt Co., 33 A.D.2d 652, 305 N.Y.S.2d 203, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2950 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).
33 A.D.2d 652 (Golden v. Wickhardt Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barber v. Dembroski
70 A.D.2d 745 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Felice v. St. Agnes Hospital
65 A.D.2d 388 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)