Golden v. Wickhardt Co.
This text of 33 A.D.2d 652 (Golden v. Wickhardt Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously reversed, without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Plaintiffs should be given an opportunity through disclosure to obtain facts essential to support their opposition to the motion for summary judgment. (CPLR 3212, subd. [f]; cf. Potter Real Estate Co. v. O & S Bearing & Mfg. Co., 32 A D 2d 883.) (Appeal from order of Onondaga Special Term granting motion for summary judgment in action for damages for trespass.) Present — Marsh, J. P., Gabrielli, Moule, Bastow and Henry, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 A.D.2d 652, 305 N.Y.S.2d 203, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golden-v-wickhardt-co-nyappdiv-1969.