Golden v. State

29 S.W. 779, 34 Tex. Crim. 143, 1895 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 48
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 16, 1895
DocketNo. 479.
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 29 S.W. 779 (Golden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Golden v. State, 29 S.W. 779, 34 Tex. Crim. 143, 1895 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 48 (Tex. 1895).

Opinion

HURT, Presiding Judge.

This conviction was had for a violation of the terms of article 341a of the Penal Code, prohibiting the keeping of disorderly houses. Appellant was the tenant of a certain house, at which malt liquor was kept for sale and sold by him. If he permitted lewd women, or women of bad reputation for chastity, to display or conduct themselves in said house in a lewd, lascivious, or indecent manner, he was guilty of keeping a disorderly house. He objected to evidence that women who visited his house were of bad reputation for chastity. This evidence was clearly admissible, made so by the very terms of the statute defining the offense.

Nor did the court err in admitting evidence as to the reputation of his house; this testimony was competent. Such is the settled rule.

The record discloses, that lewd women and women of bad reputation for chastity were permitted to conduct themselves in an indecent manner in said house. Both black and white prostitutes and women of bad reputation for chastity were permitted to assemble at his house, get drunk, and fight with each other. This conduct was repeated and sustained, so much so that it attracted the attention of the neighbors. When this indictment was presented this conduct ceased.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Judges all present and concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. State
193 S.W.2d 528 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1946)
Youngblood v. State
243 S.W. 1091 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Cross v. State
213 S.W. 638 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1919)
Clark v. State
174 S.W. 354 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1915)
Smith v. State
162 S.W. 835 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Golden v. State
160 S.W. 957 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Putman v. State
1913 OK CR 139 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1913)
Dimitri v. State
155 S.W. 535 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Wilson v. State
136 S.W. 447 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Wimberly v. State
108 S.W. 384 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1908)
Joliff v. State
109 S.W. 176 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 S.W. 779, 34 Tex. Crim. 143, 1895 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golden-v-state-texcrimapp-1895.