Golden v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Golden v. State

99 S.E. 470, 23 Ga. App. 788, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 351

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 9, 1919

Docket10438

StatusPublished

This text of 99 S.E. 470 (Golden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Golden v. State, 99 S.E. 470, 23 Ga. App. 788, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 351 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, P. J.

1. The'conviction of the defendant not depending wholly upon circumstantial evidence, the court, in the absence of a timely and appropriate written request, did not err in failing to charge the, law of circumstantial evidence.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and having been' approved by the trial judge, and no -error of law appearing, this court is without authority to reverse the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur. '

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, P. J.

1. The'conviction of the defendant not depending wholly upon circumstantial evidence, the court, in the absence of a timely and appropriate written request, did not err in failing to charge the, law of circumstantial evidence.

2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, and having been' approved by the trial judge, and no -error of law appearing, this court is without authority to reverse the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Stephens, JJ., concur. '

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 S.E. 470, 23 Ga. App. 788, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golden-v-state-gactapp-1919.