Golden v. Nelson

130 So. 40, 100 Fla. 805
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 17, 1930·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— This cause’having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said judgment. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and' the same is hereby affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Golden v. Nelson, 130 So. 40, 100 Fla. 805 (Fla. 1930).

130 So. 40 (Golden v. Nelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.