Golden v. Goode
This text of 76 Miss. 400 (Golden v. Goode) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The rule as to voluntary conveyances may be thus stated. [402]*402A grantee in a voluntary conveyance must show, as against a creditor of the grantor, who is such at the date of the conveyance, that such grantor left out of such voluntary conveyance property easily accessible to execution, amply sufficient, in the ordinary course of events, to satisfy his then existing legal liabilities. That is his precise burden. In this case, besides answering the fraud, the demurrer is a general one, on one or more grounds.
Affirmed, with leave to answer in thirty days from filing of mandate in court below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 Miss. 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golden-v-goode-miss-1898.