Golden v. Ford
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
No. 1D2025-1829
RICARDO GOLDEN, Petitioner, v.
TOMMY FORD,
Respondent.
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.
January 28, 2026
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Logan v. State, 846 So. 2d 472, 479 (Fla. 2003).
OSTERHAUS, C.J., and ROBERTS and BILBREY, JJ., concur.
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
Ricardo Golden, pro se, Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Golden v. Ford, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).
Golden v. Ford (Golden v. Ford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Logan v. State
846 So. 2d 472 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)