Golden v. Ford

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 28, 2026·No. 1D2025-1829·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D2025-1829

RICARDO GOLDEN, Petitioner, v.

TOMMY FORD,

Respondent.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

January 28, 2026

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Logan v. State, 846 So. 2d 472, 479 (Fla. 2003).

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and ROBERTS and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Ricardo Golden, pro se, Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Golden v. Ford, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Golden v. Ford (Golden v. Ford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Logan v. State
846 So. 2d 472 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)