Golden v. Ford
This text of Golden v. Ford (Golden v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2025-1829 _____________________________
RICARDO GOLDEN,
Petitioner,
v.
TOMMY FORD,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.
January 28, 2026
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Logan v. State, 846 So. 2d 472, 479 (Fla. 2003).
OSTERHAUS, C.J., and ROBERTS and BILBREY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Ricardo Golden, pro se, Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Golden v. Ford, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golden-v-ford-fladistctapp-2026.