Golden v. Ford

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 28, 2026
Docket1D2025-1829
StatusPublished

This text of Golden v. Ford (Golden v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Golden v. Ford, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D2025-1829 _____________________________

RICARDO GOLDEN,

Petitioner,

v.

TOMMY FORD,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

January 28, 2026

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Logan v. State, 846 So. 2d 472, 479 (Fla. 2003).

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and ROBERTS and BILBREY, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Ricardo Golden, pro se, Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Logan v. State
846 So. 2d 472 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Golden v. Ford, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golden-v-ford-fladistctapp-2026.