Golden v. Florida Dept. of Corrections
This text of 739 So. 2d 1273 (Golden v. Florida Dept. of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Samuel Christopher GOLDEN, Petitioner,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Samuel Christopher Golden, pro se, petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of mandamus is granted, and the circuit court is directed to enter a written order disposing of petitioner's "Objection to Order to Dismiss," which we construe to be in the nature of a motion for rehearing. Because we are confident that the circuit court will promptly comply with this directive, we withhold formal issuance of the writ.
MINER and BENTON, JJ., concur; PADOVANO, J., dissents without opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
739 So. 2d 1273, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 11848, 1999 WL 682951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golden-v-florida-dept-of-corrections-fladistctapp-1999.