Golden v. Estate

257 So. 3d 652
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 10, 2018
DocketNo. 1D16-4960
StatusPublished

This text of 257 So. 3d 652 (Golden v. Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Golden v. Estate, 257 So. 3d 652 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

*653In Burdoo v. Plympton , this court held that "[a] court reversibly errs when a prisoner requests to appear telephonically[ ] and the court fails to issue an order directed to the Department of Corrections requiring the prisoner to appear telephonically." 219 So.3d 170, 171 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) ; accord Havenner v. Hutchinson , 162 So.3d 1113, 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015). In this case, that is what happened.

REVERSED .

Roberts, Ray, and Winsor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jerry W. Havenner v. Debora Hutchinson
162 So. 3d 1113 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Gregory S. Burdoo v. Kristen T. Plympton
219 So. 3d 170 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
257 So. 3d 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golden-v-estate-fladistctapp-2018.