Golden v. Crow

862 So. 2d 903, 2003 WL 22989018
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 22, 2003
Docket2D03-5572
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 862 So. 2d 903 (Golden v. Crow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Golden v. Crow, 862 So. 2d 903, 2003 WL 22989018 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

862 So.2d 903 (2003)

Galen GOLDEN, Petitioner,
v.
Lawrence W. CROW, Jr., As Sheriff of Polk County, Respondent.

No. 2D03-5572.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 22, 2003.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Robert V. Hartman, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Petitioner.

*904 Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Danilo Cruz-Carino, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Galen Golden petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus. Golden is being held without bond on charges of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and violation of injunction against repeat violence, for which he is eligible for pretrial detention under section 907.041(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2002). However, the State has failed to file a motion for pretrial detention pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.132. Rule 3.132(a) states, "If no such motion is filed, or the motion is facially insufficient, the judicial officer shall proceed to determine the conditions of release pursuant to the provisions of rule 3.131(b)(1)." Rule 3.131(b)(1) sets forth the possible conditions of release, none of which include being held without bond.

Because the State has failed to file a motion for pretrial detention, we grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus and remand for the trial court to conduct a hearing pursuant to rule 3.131(b)(1) and determine appropriate conditions of release. The trial court is directed to hold the hearing by noon, Wednesday, December 24, 2003. Should the trial court fail to do so, it shall impose the standard bond for a third-degree felony and a first-degree misdemeanor.

Petition granted; remanded with directions.

ALTENBERND, C.J., and FULMER and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

JACARIE JOSEPH v. DANIEL JUNIOR, etc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2021
Osias v. Bradshaw
84 So. 3d 1283 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
In Re Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.132
19 So. 3d 306 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2009)
Miller v. State
980 So. 2d 1092 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Ho v. State
929 So. 2d 1155 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Griffith v. State
914 So. 2d 1053 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
862 So. 2d 903, 2003 WL 22989018, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golden-v-crow-fladistctapp-2003.