Golden v. Board of Directors of Public Schools
This text of 34 La. 354 (Golden v. Board of Directors of Public Schools) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
On Motion to Dismiss.
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The plaintiff and appellee moves to dismiss the appeal in this case on the sole ground that the defendants have obtained a suspensive appeal from the judgment against them, without giving bond, as required by law.
This motion was filed on the 5th of May, inst. On the 16th, following, [355]*355the plaintiff and appellee, without any reserve, ordered the case to be placed on the summary docket, as one entitled to be tried on the merits, by preference, under Act 15 of 1880, which was accordingly done.
This order is equivalent to causing the case to be sot down for trial. After such action, the plaintiff and appellee must be deemed as having waived, and cannot, therefore, urge the motion to dismiss, which, therefore, abates. Tlie appellee cannot first ask a dismissal, and next, unconditionally, a trial. The two positions are inconsistent. The latter repudiates the former. 16 A. 337 •, 12 A. 745.,
The case would be different had the motion and the merits been submitted together, as is sometimes done, particularly in the country.
The motion to dismiss is refused.
Rehearing refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 La. 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golden-v-board-of-directors-of-public-schools-la-1882.