Golden v. AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
759 N.W.2d 393
This text of 759 N.W.2d 393 (Golden v. AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Golden v. AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 759 N.W.2d 393 (Mich. 2009).
Opinion
Laurie Karbal GOLDEN, f/k/a Laurie Karbal Brant, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Appellee,
v.
AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, and
Norman H. Brant, d/b/a Norman H. Brant, DPM, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant/Appellant, and
Franklin Bank, N.A., Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 5, 2008 *394 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
759 N.W.2d 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golden-v-amica-mutual-insurance-company-mich-2009.