Golden Roberson v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 5, 2025
DocketA25A0825
StatusPublished

This text of Golden Roberson v. State (Golden Roberson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Golden Roberson v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,________________________ February 05, 2025

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25A0825. GOLDEN ROBERSON v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT’S MOTION TO REMAND to

complete the record in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby

GRANTED.

It is well settled that appellate courts are permitted to supplement the record

on appeal. Indeed,

[a]t any stage of the proceedings, either before or after argument, the court shall by order, either with or without motion, require that additional portions of the record or transcript of proceedings be sent up, or require that a complete transcript of evidence and proceedings be prepared and sent up, or take any other action to perfect the appeal and record so that the appellate court can and will pass upon the appeal[.]

(Citation and punctuation omitted.) Damani v. State, 284 Ga. 372, 374 (2) (667 SE2d

372) (2008).

Here, according to Roberson, the appellate record lacks the trial court’s

December 12, 2024 order denying his second amended motion for new trial, and the record cannot be supplemented with that order in a timely manner. Given the lack of

countervailing evidence, we will accept these representations as true.

Accordingly, because we cannot resolve this appeal based on the current record,

we remove [this case] from the appeal docket and remand [it] to the trial court for completion of the record without delay. Once the completed [order] is on file with the trial court and the trial court has entered an order stating that the record is complete or that it cannot be completed, [Roberson] shall have 30 days from the date of the mandated order to refile [his] notice[] of appeal, and upon the filing of such notice[] of appeal the case with the complete record and transcript may be transmitted to the Court of Appeals for redocketing.

Galardi v. Steele-Inman, 259 Ga. App. 249 (576 SE2d 555) (2002).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,___________________ 02/05/2025 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Galardi v. Steele-Inman
576 S.E.2d 555 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2002)
Damani v. State
667 S.E.2d 372 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Golden Roberson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golden-roberson-v-state-gactapp-2025.