Golden Palms Retirement & Health v. Edna Nyboer, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Donald Nyboer

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 5, 2010
Docket13-09-00575-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Golden Palms Retirement & Health v. Edna Nyboer, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Donald Nyboer (Golden Palms Retirement & Health v. Edna Nyboer, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Donald Nyboer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Golden Palms Retirement & Health v. Edna Nyboer, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Donald Nyboer, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

                                       NUMBER 13-09-00575-CV

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

GOLDEN PALMS RETIREMENT & HEALTH,                          Appellant,

                                                             v.

EDNA NYBOER, INDIVIDUALLY AND

AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE

OF DONALD NYBOER,                                                                  Appellee.

                     On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

                                      of Cameron County, Texas.

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

                     Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, Golden Palms Retirement & Health, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 2 of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2009-CCL-341-B.  Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal and requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).  Appellant=s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.  Costs will be taxed against appellant.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").  Having dismissed the appeal at appellant=s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

5th day of August, 2010.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Golden Palms Retirement & Health v. Edna Nyboer, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Donald Nyboer, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golden-palms-retirement-health-v-edna-nyboer-indiv-texapp-2010.