Golde v. Placentra
This text of Golde v. Placentra (Golde v. Placentra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed February 6, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
Nos. 3D18-1707 & 3D18-846
Lower Tribunal Nos. 18-7533 & 18-4 ________________
Bridgé Golde, Appellant,
vs.
Michael Placentra, etc., Appellee.
Appeals from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Rodney Smith and Reemberto Diaz, Judges.
Bridgé Golde, in proper person.
Pollack, Pollack & Kogan, LLC and Lyudmila Kogan and Maria Kimijima, for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES and LINDSEY, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Upon consideration of the consolidated appeals, case number 3D17-1807 is
affirmed on the authority of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) (“After
service of the initial brief . . . the court may summarily affirm the order to be
reviewed if the court finds that no preliminary basis for reversal has been
demonstrated.”). As to case number 3D18-846, we affirm without further
discussion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Golde v. Placentra, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/golde-v-placentra-fladistctapp-2019.