Goldblum v. Power

6 A.D.2d 997, 177 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4986

This text of 6 A.D.2d 997 (Goldblum v. Power) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldblum v. Power, 6 A.D.2d 997, 177 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4986 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Opinion

— Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Ughetta and Murphy, JJ., concur; Kleinfeld, J., dissents and votes to modify the order by striking therefrom the first ordering paragraph and by substituting therefor a provision that the application be denied with respect to the persons named in said paragraph, with the following memorandum: In my opinion the petition here adequately complies with the statute (Election Law, § 12). There is no requirement in the statute that each designee should be specifically labeled “male” or “female” where that fact is otherwise clearly evident.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 A.D.2d 997, 177 N.Y.S.2d 901, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldblum-v-power-nyappdiv-1958.