Goldblum v. Power
This text of 153 N.E.2d 390 (Goldblum v. Power) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order of the Appellate Division modified, insofar as it holds the designating petitions void in part for failure to designate candidates for County Committeemen separately by sexes, and as to that question order reversed and proceeding dismissed and, as so modified, order in all other respects affirmed. We hold that the form of these petitions meets the requirements of section 12 of the Election Law since they adequately disclose [752]*752which candidates are male and which are female only. No opinion.
Concur: Judges Desmond, Dye, Van Voorhis, Burke, Bergan #, MacAeeer * and Taylor
Designated pursuant to section 5 of article VI of the State Constitution in the temporary absence of Chief Judge Conway and Judges Fold and Froessed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 N.E.2d 390, 5 N.Y.2d 749, 178 N.Y.S.2d 650, 1958 N.Y. LEXIS 836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldblum-v-power-ny-1958.