Goldblum v. Power

153 N.E.2d 390, 5 N.Y.2d 749, 178 N.Y.S.2d 650, 1958 N.Y. LEXIS 836
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 7, 1958
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 153 N.E.2d 390 (Goldblum v. Power) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldblum v. Power, 153 N.E.2d 390, 5 N.Y.2d 749, 178 N.Y.S.2d 650, 1958 N.Y. LEXIS 836 (N.Y. 1958).

Opinion

Order of the Appellate Division modified, insofar as it holds the designating petitions void in part for failure to designate candidates for County Committeemen separately by sexes, and as to that question order reversed and proceeding dismissed and, as so modified, order in all other respects affirmed. We hold that the form of these petitions meets the requirements of section 12 of the Election Law since they adequately disclose [752]*752which candidates are male and which are female only. No opinion.

Concur: Judges Desmond, Dye, Van Voorhis, Burke, Bergan #, MacAeeer * and Taylor

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bosco v. Smith
104 A.D.2d 462 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
153 N.E.2d 390, 5 N.Y.2d 749, 178 N.Y.S.2d 650, 1958 N.Y. LEXIS 836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldblum-v-power-ny-1958.