Goldblum v. Power

153 N.E.2d 390, 5 N.Y.2d 749, 178 N.Y.S.2d 650, 1958 N.Y. LEXIS 836
New York Court of Appeals·Decided August 7, 1958·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order of the Appellate Division modified, insofar as it holds the designating petitions void in part for failure to designate candidates for County Committeemen separately by sexes, and as to that question order reversed and proceeding dismissed and, as so modified, order in all other respects affirmed. We hold that the form of these petitions meets the requirements of section 12 of the Election Law since they adequately disclose [752]*752which candidates are male and which are female only. No opinion.

Concur: Judges Desmond, Dye, Van Voorhis, Burke, Bergan #, MacAeeer * and Taylor

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldblum v. Power, 153 N.E.2d 390, 5 N.Y.2d 749, 178 N.Y.S.2d 650, 1958 N.Y. LEXIS 836 (N.Y. 1958).

153 N.E.2d 390 (Goldblum v. Power) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bosco v. Smith
104 A.D.2d 462 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)