Goldblum v. Cadillac Homes, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldblum v. Cadillac Homes, Inc.

8 A.D.2d 822, 190 N.Y.S.2d 158, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8339

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 8, 1959·Published

Opinion

In' an action to recover real estate brokerage commissions, the appeal is from an order denying, with leave to renew, appellant’s motion to examine respondent by its president before trial. Appeal dismissed, without costs. The order is not appealable. (Belfi v. International Commercial Corp., 277 App. Div. 787; Kalmanash v. Weinstein, 271 App. Div. 788; Weinrib v. American Binder Co., 270 App. Div. 914.) We have, however, examined the merits, and would affirm the order sought to be appealed from if we had not dismissed the appeal. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In' an action to recover real estate brokerage commissions, the appeal is from an order denying, with leave to renew, appellant’s motion to examine respondent by its president before trial. Appeal dismissed, without costs. The order is not appealable. (Belfi v. International Commercial Corp., 277 App. Div. 787; Kalmanash v. Weinstein, 271 App. Div. 788; Weinrib v. American Binder Co., 270 App. Div. 914.) We have, however, examined the merits, and would affirm the order sought to be appealed from if we had not dismissed the appeal. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Goldblum v. Cadillac Homes, Inc., 8 A.D.2d 822, 190 N.Y.S.2d 158, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8339 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

8 A.D.2d 822 (Goldblum v. Cadillac Homes, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related