Goldblum v. Cadillac Homes, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldblum v. Cadillac Homes, Inc.

8 A.D.2d 822, 190 N.Y.S.2d 158, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8339

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 8, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.2d 822 (Goldblum v. Cadillac Homes, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldblum v. Cadillac Homes, Inc., 8 A.D.2d 822, 190 N.Y.S.2d 158, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8339 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

In' an action to recover real estate brokerage commissions, the appeal is from an order denying, with leave to renew, appellant’s motion to examine respondent by its president before trial. Appeal dismissed, without costs. The order is not appealable. (Belfi v. International Commercial Corp., 277 App. Div. 787; Kalmanash v. Weinstein, 271 App. Div. 788; Weinrib v. American Binder Co., 270 App. Div. 914.) We have, however, examined the merits, and would affirm the order sought to be appealed from if we had not dismissed the appeal. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In' an action to recover real estate brokerage commissions, the appeal is from an order denying, with leave to renew, appellant’s motion to examine respondent by its president before trial. Appeal dismissed, without costs. The order is not appealable. (Belfi v. International Commercial Corp., 277 App. Div. 787; Kalmanash v. Weinstein, 271 App. Div. 788; Weinrib v. American Binder Co., 270 App. Div. 914.) We have, however, examined the merits, and would affirm the order sought to be appealed from if we had not dismissed the appeal. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 822, 190 N.Y.S.2d 158, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldblum-v-cadillac-homes-inc-nyappdiv-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack