Goldberger v. Gellert
This text of 260 A.D. 998 (Goldberger v. Gellert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Per Curiam.
According full weight to all the testimony adduced before the official referee and taking into consideration all the elements which may be fairly considered as affecting the market value of the property here involved (Heiman v. Bishop, 272 N. Y. 83), we think that the fair market value as of the date of sale was $11,000 and no.t $9,000 as fixed by the Special Term. The deficiency judgment entered herein should be reduced accordingly.
The order and the judgment should be modified as indicated, and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to the defendants-appellants.
Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Order and judgment unanimously modified as indicated in opinion, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the defendants-appellants. Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
260 A.D. 998, 23 N.Y.S.2d 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldberger-v-gellert-nyappdiv-1940.