Goldberger v. Flink
This text of 7 R.I. Dec. 55 (Goldberger v. Flink) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Heard upon prayer for preliminary injunction.
' The prayer of the bill asks that Morris Flink and .Adelard J. Gringas, respondents, may be temporarily and permanently restrained from disposing of certain goods and chattels described in the said bill, or from encumbering the same, also from alienating or disposing of five certain promissory notes therein described, and that Ádelard J. Gringas may be declared to toe a trustee holding certain unpaid notes, and any right in the goods and chattels held as security for said notes, for the benefit of all the holders of such notes, and further asks that Morris Flink, respondent, be held as trustee of a fund of $1300 received by him as set forth in said bill, for the benefit of said [56]*56complainant as his interest may appear.
The Court is of the opinion that there is sufficient equity shown by complainant to require the granting of a temporary injunction until a hearing on bill and answer.
Decree to that effect may be entered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 R.I. Dec. 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldberger-v-flink-risuperct-1930.