Goldberg Weprin & Ustin v. Tishman Construction Corp.

748 N.E.2d 1071, 96 N.Y.2d 769, 725 N.Y.S.2d 275, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 556
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 22, 2001
StatusPublished

This text of 748 N.E.2d 1071 (Goldberg Weprin & Ustin v. Tishman Construction Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldberg Weprin & Ustin v. Tishman Construction Corp., 748 N.E.2d 1071, 96 N.Y.2d 769, 725 N.Y.S.2d 275, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 556 (N.Y. 2001).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed that part of Supreme Court’s order that denied appellant’s motion for class certification, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise granted. Cross motion for consolidation of this appeal with the appeal in 5th Ave. Chocolatiere v 540 Acquisition Co. denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
748 N.E.2d 1071, 96 N.Y.2d 769, 725 N.Y.S.2d 275, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldberg-weprin-ustin-v-tishman-construction-corp-ny-2001.