Goldberg v. Torrey

1 Gunby 100
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJuly 1, 1885
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Gunby 100 (Goldberg v. Torrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldberg v. Torrey, 1 Gunby 100 (La. Ct. App. 1885).

Opinion

Clinton, J.

Where the owner of a plantation enters into a written contract with a merchant, who furnishes supplies to the tenants-on said plantation, whereby said planter agrees that he will waive his lessor’s lien in favor of said merchant, in case of a total failure of the crop, and the word ‘‘total” is erased, and there is a conflict of evidence as to who erased it, held : The con[101]*101tract will be construed against defendant who wrote it, for the reason that it would he nugatory if the word “total” were left in it. C. C. 1950, 1951, 1957.

2.A crop is a failure when it does not pay the expenses reasonably necessary to make it, under ordinary circumstances.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Gunby 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldberg-v-torrey-lactapp-1885.