Goldberg v. State Tax Commission

271 A.D.2d 861

This text of 271 A.D.2d 861 (Goldberg v. State Tax Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldberg v. State Tax Commission, 271 A.D.2d 861 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Opinion

Proceedings under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review a determination made by the State Tax Commission which held that an instrument in the form of a full covenant deed, dated September 23, 1926, and executed by Bertha Kosoff to petitioner, Benjamin Goldberg, was subject to a mortgage recording tax imposed by article 11 of the Tax Law as a mortgage securing an indefinite amount within the meaning of section 256 of the Tax Law. At the time of the delivery of the deed, petitioner held mort-' gages upon the property conveyed to the extent of $9,300. No new or other consideration passed at that time. The settlement of an action by Bertha Kosoff against petitioner about fourteen years later and the payment of $1,000 did not, under the circumstances, furnish any new consideration which would justify the imposition of any additional recording tax. Determination and order of the State Tax Commission annulled, with $50 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 A.D.2d 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldberg-v-state-tax-commission-nyappdiv-1946.