Goldberg v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Goldberg v. State

85 S.E. 972, 16 Ga. App. 691, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 197

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedAugust 5, 1915

Docket6545

StatusPublished

This text of 85 S.E. 972 (Goldberg v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldberg v. State, 85 S.E. 972, 16 Ga. App. 691, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 197 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Wade, J.

1. There was ample evidence to authorize the conviction of the defendant, and the alleged newly discovered evidence is not only cumulative and impeaching in character, but would probably not produce any different result on another trial.

2. There is no merit in the various assignments of error, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Russell, O. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wade, J.

1. There was ample evidence to authorize the conviction of the defendant, and the alleged newly discovered evidence is not only cumulative and impeaching in character, but would probably not produce any different result on another trial.

2. There is no merit in the various assignments of error, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Russell, O. J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 S.E. 972, 16 Ga. App. 691, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldberg-v-state-gactapp-1915.