Goldberg v. . Markowitz

New York Court of Appeals

Goldberg v. . Markowitz

72 N.E. 1149, 179 N.Y. 596, 1904 N.Y. LEXIS 1273

DecidedNovember 22, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 72 N.E. 1149 (Goldberg v. . Markowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldberg v. . Markowitz, 72 N.E. 1149, 179 N.Y. 596, 1904 N.Y. LEXIS 1273 (N.Y. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

*597 Haight, J.

This case is entitled to preference under section 791, subdivision four, of the Code of Civil Procedure, but it is not upon the present calendar. The judgment is for a sum of money, involving no question of public importance. It is not our practice to add cases to the existing calendar even though they are entitled to preference unless some question of public importance is involved, or the circumstances are extraordinary.

The motion to prefer and put case upon the calendar should be denied, with ten dollars costs.

Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Yann and Werner, JJ., concur.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*597 Haight, J.

This case is entitled to preference under section 791, subdivision four, of the Code of Civil Procedure, but it is not upon the present calendar. The judgment is for a sum of money, involving no question of public importance. It is not our practice to add cases to the existing calendar even though they are entitled to preference unless some question of public importance is involved, or the circumstances are extraordinary.

The motion to prefer and put case upon the calendar should be denied, with ten dollars costs.

Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Yann and Werner, JJ., concur.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 N.E. 1149, 179 N.Y. 596, 1904 N.Y. LEXIS 1273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldberg-v-markowitz-ny-1904.