Goldberg v. . Markowitz

New York Court of Appeals

Goldberg v. . Markowitz

72 N.E. 1149, 179 N.Y. 596, 1904 N.Y. LEXIS 1273

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Goldberg v. . Markowitz. Read the opinion of the Court — 182 N.Y. 540 →

New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 22, 1904·Published

Opinion

*597 Haight, J.

This case is entitled to preference under section 791, subdivision four, of the Code of Civil Procedure, but it is not upon the present calendar. The judgment is for a sum of money, involving no question of public importance. It is not our practice to add cases to the existing calendar even though they are entitled to preference unless some question of public importance is involved, or the circumstances are extraordinary.

The motion to prefer and put case upon the calendar should be denied, with ten dollars costs.

Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Yann and Werner, JJ., concur.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*597 Haight, J.

This case is entitled to preference under section 791, subdivision four, of the Code of Civil Procedure, but it is not upon the present calendar. The judgment is for a sum of money, involving no question of public importance. It is not our practice to add cases to the existing calendar even though they are entitled to preference unless some question of public importance is involved, or the circumstances are extraordinary.

The motion to prefer and put case upon the calendar should be denied, with ten dollars costs.

Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Yann and Werner, JJ., concur.

Motion denied.

Goldberg v. . Markowitz, 72 N.E. 1149, 179 N.Y. 596, 1904 N.Y. LEXIS 1273 (N.Y. 1904).

Pincite

72 N.E. 1149 (Goldberg v. . Markowitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.