Goldberg v. Levy
137 A. 917, 101 N.J. Eq. 293, 16 Stock. 293, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 574
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Church.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 13.
For reversal — ETone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goldberg v. Levy, 137 A. 917, 101 N.J. Eq. 293, 16 Stock. 293, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 574 (N.J. 1927).
137 A. 917 (Goldberg v. Levy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Marioni v. 94 Broadway, Inc.
866 A.2d 208 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2005)
Scult v. Bergen Valley Builders, Inc.
183 A.2d 865 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)