Goldberg v. Kornblum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldberg v. Kornblum

229 A.D. 729

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 229 A.D. 729 (Goldberg v. Kornblum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldberg v. Kornblum, 229 A.D. 729 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting plaintiff’s motion to open his default upon condition reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The default in this case was due to the inexcusable neglect [730]*730of plaintiff in preparing Ms case for trial. The failure of plaintiff to disclose the facts with reference to the appearance of this case on the calendar before December 18, 1929, indicates a lack of good faith in the application. Lazansky, P, J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting plaintiff’s motion to open his default upon condition reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The default in this case was due to the inexcusable neglect [730]*730of plaintiff in preparing Ms case for trial. The failure of plaintiff to disclose the facts with reference to the appearance of this case on the calendar before December 18, 1929, indicates a lack of good faith in the application. Lazansky, P, J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 A.D. 729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldberg-v-kornblum-nyappdiv-1930.