Goldberg v. Korman

257 A.D. 990, 13 N.Y.S.2d 708, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8836
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 27, 1939·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order dismissing amended complaint for insufficiency in an action for a money judgment for damages claimed to have resulted from a conspiracy entered into by the defendants to deprive plaintiff of an opportunity to collect a judgment, and judgment entered in accordance therewith, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to the commencement of an action pursuant to sections 276, 278 of the Debtor and Creditor Law. Plaintiff already has a judgment and may not obtain another and thus exact a double recovery. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., concurs in result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldberg v. Korman, 257 A.D. 990, 13 N.Y.S.2d 708, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

257 A.D. 990 (Goldberg v. Korman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vinlis Construction Co. v. Roreck
67 Misc. 2d 942 (New York Supreme Court, 1971)
James v. Powell
25 A.D.2d 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)
Kaspin v. Thaw
262 A.D. 861 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)