Goldberg v. Kletz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldberg v. Kletz

211 A.D. 804

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1924·Published

Opinion

Judgment of the County Court of Kings county reversed upon the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. The dismissal of the complaint as to both defendants was error; the disputed question of fact should have been submitted to the jury. The trial court also erred in excluding evidence of the defendant Enright’s admission in his former answer at folios 233 to 239 of the record, and in admitting in evidence the defendants’ Exhibits A and B at folios 547 and 549 of the record.

Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the County Court of Kings county reversed upon the law and the facts, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. The dismissal of the complaint as to both defendants was error; the disputed question of fact should have been submitted to the jury. The trial court also erred in excluding evidence of the defendant Enright’s admission in his former answer at folios 233 to 239 of the record, and in admitting in evidence the defendants’ Exhibits A and B at folios 547 and 549 of the record.

Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur.

Goldberg v. Kletz, 211 A.D. 804 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

211 A.D. 804 (Goldberg v. Kletz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.