Goldberg v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldberg v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

89 N.Y.S. 1105

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 23, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 89 N.Y.S. 1105 (Goldberg v. Interurban Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldberg v. Interurban Street Railway Co., 89 N.Y.S. 1105 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Cahnmann v. Metropolitan Street Ry. Co., 37 Misc. Rep. 475, 75 N. Y. Supp. 970. The explicit admission upon the trial that Goldberg drove the wagon at the time of the collision, that the action for damages to the wagon resulted from the collision, and that judgment was rendered in that action for defendant on the merits, supplies every material fact that would be disclosed upon a production of the judgment roll.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Cahnmann v. Metropolitan Street Ry. Co., 37 Misc. Rep. 475, 75 N. Y. Supp. 970. The explicit admission upon the trial that Goldberg drove the wagon at the time of the collision, that the action for damages to the wagon resulted from the collision, and that judgment was rendered in that action for defendant on the merits, supplies every material fact that would be disclosed upon a production of the judgment roll.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 N.Y.S. 1105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldberg-v-interurban-street-railway-co-nyappterm-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack