Goldberg v. Interurban Street Railway Co.
89 N.Y.S. 1105
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. Cahnmann v. Metropolitan Street Ry. Co., 37 Misc. Rep. 475, 75 N. Y. Supp. 970. The explicit admission upon the trial that Goldberg drove the wagon at the time of the collision, that the action for damages to the wagon resulted from the collision, and that judgment was rendered in that action for defendant on the merits, supplies every material fact that would be disclosed upon a production of the judgment roll.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Goldberg v. Interurban Street Railway Co., 89 N.Y.S. 1105 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).
89 N.Y.S. 1105 (Goldberg v. Interurban Street Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cahnmann v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
37 Misc. 475 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1902)