Goldberg v. Goldberg

204 A.D.2d 513, 614 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5288
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 16, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 204 A.D.2d 513 (Goldberg v. Goldberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldberg v. Goldberg, 204 A.D.2d 513, 614 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5288 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—In an action to partition real property, the defendant appeals (1) from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ruskin, J.), dated May 29, 1992, as, inter alia, confirmed that portion of a Referee’s report, dated May 17, 1991, determining that the defendant was not entitled to a credit for taxes he allegedly paid on the plaintiff’s behalf, and (2) from so much of an order of the same court, entered August 12, 1992, as denied his motion for reargument.

Ordered that the appeal from the order entered August 12, 1992, is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

On a prior appeal, this Court held that the defendant was entitled to an allowance or credit if he paid more than his [514]*514proportionate share of the taxes on the subject premises (see, Goldberg v Goldberg, 173 AD2d 679). The defendant, however, failed to furnish the Referee with adequate proof of the amounts that he allegedly overpaid. Therefore, the court’s ruling that he is not entitled to a credit for these alleged payments should not be disturbed.

The defendants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lewis v. Jefferson
45 A.D.3d 814 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 A.D.2d 513, 614 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldberg-v-goldberg-nyappdiv-1994.