Goldberg v. Goldberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldberg v. Goldberg

131 A.D.2d 543, 516 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47999

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 8, 1987

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 131 A.D.2d 543 (Goldberg v. Goldberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldberg v. Goldberg, 131 A.D.2d 543, 516 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47999 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J.), dated November 21, 1986, as denied her application for a stay of the defendant husband pursuing his Florida divorce action pending a determination of her motion for a preliminary injunction enjoining the defendant from pursuing his Florida divorce action.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

This appeal is now academic since a decision has been rendered on the motion for a preliminary injunction. Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Weiner, J.), dated November 21, 1986, as denied her application for a stay of the defendant husband pursuing his Florida divorce action pending a determination of her motion for a preliminary injunction enjoining the defendant from pursuing his Florida divorce action.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

This appeal is now academic since a decision has been rendered on the motion for a preliminary injunction. Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 A.D.2d 543, 516 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldberg-v-goldberg-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack