Goldberg v. Goldberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldberg v. Goldberg

57 A.D.2d 585, 393 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11569

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 18, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 57 A.D.2d 585 (Goldberg v. Goldberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldberg v. Goldberg, 57 A.D.2d 585, 393 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11569 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a matrimonial action, (1) the defendant husband appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 10, 1976, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, (a) granted a divorce to the plaintiff on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment; (b) awarded custody of the parties’ child to the plaintiff; (c) awarded plaintiff a counsel fee; and (d) directed the sale of the marital residence and an equal division of the proceeds therefrom; and (2) plaintiff cross-appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from so much of the said judgment as awarded her a counsel fee. Judgment affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff. The trial court’s determination is adequately supported by the record. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Hawkins, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action, (1) the defendant husband appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 10, 1976, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, (a) granted a divorce to the plaintiff on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment; (b) awarded custody of the parties’ child to the plaintiff; (c) awarded plaintiff a counsel fee; and (d) directed the sale of the marital residence and an equal division of the proceeds therefrom; and (2) plaintiff cross-appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from so much of the said judgment as awarded her a counsel fee. Judgment affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff. The trial court’s determination is adequately supported by the record. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Hawkins, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A.D.2d 585, 393 N.Y.S.2d 558, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldberg-v-goldberg-nyappdiv-1977.