Goldberg v. Goldberg

512 So. 2d 343, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2241, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10243
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 16, 1987·No. No. 4-86-2307·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellee concedes and it also appears to have been the trial court’s intention that the wife be solely obligated for the mortgage payments, taxes and insurance upon the marital residence, title to which the wife was awarded as lump sum alimony pursuant to the final judgment of dissolution of marriage. See Hamori v. Hamori, 490 So.2d 147 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), and Farrington v. Farrington, 390 So.2d 461 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

[344]*344We remand this cause with directions to the trial court to amend the final judgment to provide for appellee to be solely obligated for the payments of the mortgage, taxes and insurance upon the marital residence. We affirm the final judgment in all other respects.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

DOWNEY and GUNTHER, JJ., and VITALE, LINDA L., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldberg v. Goldberg, 512 So. 2d 343, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2241, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10243 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

512 So. 2d 343 (Goldberg v. Goldberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Farrington v. Farrington
390 So. 2d 461 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Hamori v. Hamori
490 So. 2d 147 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)