Goldberg v. Friedman
This text of 187 Misc. 445 (Goldberg v. Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum
The evidence established that the landlord was possessed of more than sufficient equity in the property within the fair contemplation of subdivision (d) of section 8 of chapter 314 of the Laws of 1945. The fact that he momentarily took title thereto in the name of a dummy corporation, of which he was the sole stockholder, may not be invoked for the purpose of defeating his rights herein. The Trial Court’s finding of the facts in favor of the landlord necessarily included a holding that he sought in good faith to recover the premises for his immediate personal use.
The final order should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with $30 costs to the landlord, and final order directed for the landlord.
MacCrate, McCooey and Steinbrink, JJ., concur.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
187 Misc. 445, 62 N.Y.S.2d 457, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldberg-v-friedman-nyappterm-1946.