Goldberg v. Edelstein
Opinion
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the respondent dated April 15, 1983, which, after a hearing, revoked petitioner’s license to carry a pistol. 11 Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. 11 Petitioner left a fully loaded, .357 Magnum revolver on a hook in his desk well while he was absent from his office. A police officer responding to a report that the office burglar alarm was sounding, found the office door open, and subsequently found the loaded gun, which he then secured, while inspecting the premises for a possible burglar. Respondent’s determination that this manner of storing the loaded weapon was inadequate and improper was neither arbitrary, capricious nor an abuse of discretion (see Matter of Budde v Rubin, 89 AD2d 1016; Matter of Pelóse v County Ct, 53 AD2d 645). We have examined the other contentions raised by petitioner and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
100 A.D.2d 968 (Goldberg v. Edelstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.