Goldberg v. Doll

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Goldberg v. Doll

1 Gunby 74

DecidedJuly 1, 1885

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Gunby 74 (Goldberg v. Doll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldberg v. Doll, 1 Gunby 74 (La. Ct. App. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

Farmer, J.

Where a plea to the jurisdiction of a court, ratione materias, is made and expressly overruled, the decision of that question be.conies res judicata before all courts.

2. Where a fi. fa. is issued from a justice of the peace court on a judgment rendered therein, qnd property worth $550 is seized and a third opponent, who claims to own the seized property, goes before the justice of the peace and obtains an injunction against the sale of said property, any judgment rendered by said justice of the peace in said injunction suit is absolutely null and void for want of jurisdiction. Third opponent should have gone into the District Court. 23 An. 608; 10 Wallace, 26.

3. A third opposition, claiming the ownership of the property, is a separate and distinct suit. C. P. 398; 7 M. 436; 6 R. 427; 9 R. 302; 12 R. 519; 1 An. 310; 11 An. 525; 15 An. 136; 23 An. 608.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Farmer, J.

Where a plea to the jurisdiction of a court, ratione materias, is made and expressly overruled, the decision of that question be.conies res judicata before all courts.

2. Where a fi. fa. is issued from a justice of the peace court on a judgment rendered therein, qnd property worth $550 is seized and a third opponent, who claims to own the seized property, goes before the justice of the peace and obtains an injunction against the sale of said property, any judgment rendered by said justice of the peace in said injunction suit is absolutely null and void for want of jurisdiction. Third opponent should have gone into the District Court. 23 An. 608; 10 Wallace, 26.

3. A third opposition, claiming the ownership of the property, is a separate and distinct suit. C. P. 398; 7 M. 436; 6 R. 427; 9 R. 302; 12 R. 519; 1 An. 310; 11 An. 525; 15 An. 136; 23 An. 608.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Gunby 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldberg-v-doll-lactapp-1885.