Home/Supreme Court of Florida/Goldberg v. Ceco Corp.

Goldberg v. Ceco Corp.

230 So. 2d 149
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 1, 1969·No. No. 38435·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Writ of certiorari having heretofore issued, argument having been heard, and the court having examined the record and briefs, it appears that the writ was improvidently issued. Accordingly, the writ of certiorari heretofore issued in this cause is discharged. See Conway v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. (Fla.1966), 185 So.2d 697.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and CARLTON, JJ., concur. ERVIN, C. J., concurs specially with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldberg v. Ceco Corp., 230 So. 2d 149 (Fla. 1969).

230 So. 2d 149 (Goldberg v. Ceco Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Duval Asphalt Products, Inc. v. E. Vaughn Rivers, Inc.
620 So. 2d 1043 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports, 1975
Goldberg v. Ceco Corp.
252 So. 2d 849 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Henninger v. State
230 So. 2d 149 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1970)