Goldberg v. Ceco Corp.

230 So. 2d 149
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 1, 1969
DocketNo. 38435
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 230 So. 2d 149 (Goldberg v. Ceco Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldberg v. Ceco Corp., 230 So. 2d 149 (Fla. 1969).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Writ of certiorari having heretofore issued, argument having been heard, and the court having examined the record and briefs, it appears that the writ was improvidently issued. Accordingly, the writ of certiorari heretofore issued in this cause is discharged. See Conway v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. (Fla.1966), 185 So.2d 697.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and CARLTON, JJ., concur. ERVIN, C. J., concurs specially with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Duval Asphalt Products, Inc. v. E. Vaughn Rivers, Inc.
620 So. 2d 1043 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports, 1975
Goldberg v. Ceco Corp.
252 So. 2d 849 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Henninger v. State
230 So. 2d 149 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 So. 2d 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldberg-v-ceco-corp-fla-1969.