Goldberg v. Blackman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Goldberg v. Blackman

250 S.W. 1119, 1923 Tex. App. LEXIS 124

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 19, 1923

DocketNo. 941.

StatusPublished

This text of 250 S.W. 1119 (Goldberg v. Blackman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldberg v. Blackman, 250 S.W. 1119, 1923 Tex. App. LEXIS 124 (Tex. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

WALKER, J.

This suit was instituted by appellee in the county court at law of Harris county to recover of appellant damages for the breach of a contract involving the sale of two cars of apples. On a trial to the court without a jury, judgment was entered in favor of appellee against appellant for the full relief prayed for. No conclusions of law and fact were filed. All of appellant’s propositions attack the judgment as being without support in the evidence. We have carefully examined both the pleadings and the evidence, and in our opinion the judgment has full support in respect to all matters assigned by appellant. As no useful purpose could be served by reviewing the pleadings and evidence on the issues thus raised, we affirm the judgment on the conclusions just announced. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WALKER, J.

This suit was instituted by appellee in the county court at law of Harris county to recover of appellant damages for the breach of a contract involving the sale of two cars of apples. On a trial to the court without a jury, judgment was entered in favor of appellee against appellant for the full relief prayed for. No conclusions of law and fact were filed. All of appellant’s propositions attack the judgment as being without support in the evidence. We have carefully examined both the pleadings and the evidence, and in our opinion the judgment has full support in respect to all matters assigned by appellant. As no useful purpose could be served by reviewing the pleadings and evidence on the issues thus raised, we affirm the judgment on the conclusions just announced. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

250 S.W. 1119, 1923 Tex. App. LEXIS 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldberg-v-blackman-texapp-1923.