Goldberg Rudkowsky v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Goldberg Rudkowsky v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

238 A.D. 704, 265 N.Y.S. 721, 1933 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9596

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 30, 1933

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 238 A.D. 704 (Goldberg Rudkowsky v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goldberg Rudkowsky v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 238 A.D. 704, 265 N.Y.S. 721, 1933 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9596 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decision upon which thé judgment appealed from rests is predicated upon the law as applied by the learned referee in Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc. of U. S. (144 Misc. 363), the appeal from which is decided herewith (238 App. Div. 696). Our decision therein adopts the findings and conclusions of the referee so far as material to sustain the decision herein.

It follows, therefore, that the judgment appealed from should be in all respects affirmed, without costs.

Present — Finch, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Townley, JJ. McAvoy, J., taking no part.

Judgment so far as appealed from affirmed, without costs, with leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals if so advised. ' .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI