Goldberg Rudkowsky v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

238 A.D. 704, 265 N.Y.S. 721, 1933 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9596
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 30, 1933·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decision upon which thé judgment appealed from rests is predicated upon the law as applied by the learned referee in Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc. of U. S. (144 Misc. 363), the appeal from which is decided herewith (238 App. Div. 696). Our decision therein adopts the findings and conclusions of the referee so far as material to sustain the decision herein.

It follows, therefore, that the judgment appealed from should be in all respects affirmed, without costs.

Present — Finch, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Townley, JJ. McAvoy, J., taking no part.

Judgment so far as appealed from affirmed, without costs, with leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals if so advised. ' .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldberg Rudkowsky v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 238 A.D. 704, 265 N.Y.S. 721, 1933 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9596 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

238 A.D. 704 (Goldberg Rudkowsky v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Van der Stegen v. Neuss, Hesslein & Co.
243 A.D. 122 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)