Goldberg-Rudkowsky v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
This text of 195 N.E. 149 (Goldberg-Rudkowsky v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment appealed from by the defendant should be reversed, and the complaint dismissed, with costs in all courts, on the authority of Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assur. Society, decided herewith (266 N. Y. 71). The judgment appealed from by the plaintiff should be affirmed, with costs, upon the authority of that case, without discussing the question of sealed instruments, it being unnecessary. (See 266 N. Y. 615.)
Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch and Loughran, JJ., concur.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
195 N.E. 149, 266 N.Y. 451, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 947, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldberg-rudkowsky-v-equitable-life-assurance-society-of-the-united-states-ny-1934.