Goldberg-Rudkowsky v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

195 N.E. 149, 266 N.Y. 451, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 947
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 31, 1934·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*452 Per Curiam.

The judgment appealed from by the defendant should be reversed, and the complaint dismissed, with costs in all courts, on the authority of Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assur. Society, decided herewith (266 N. Y. 71). The judgment appealed from by the plaintiff should be affirmed, with costs, upon the authority of that case, without discussing the question of sealed instruments, it being unnecessary. (See 266 N. Y. 615.)

Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch and Loughran, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Goldberg-Rudkowsky v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 195 N.E. 149, 266 N.Y. 451, 1934 N.Y. LEXIS 947 (N.Y. 1934).

195 N.E. 149 (Goldberg-Rudkowsky v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goldberg-Rudkowsky v. Equitable Life Assurance Society
195 N.E. 226 (New York Court of Appeals, 1935)