Goldberg, Dror Haim

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 26, 2008
DocketWR-70,242-01
StatusPublished

This text of Goldberg, Dror Haim (Goldberg, Dror Haim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Goldberg, Dror Haim, (Tex. 2008).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-70,242-01

EX PARTE DROR HAIM GOLDBERG, Applicant



ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 805617-A IN THE 248TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to 48 years' imprisonment. The First Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. See Goldberg v. State, 95 S.W.3d 345 (Tex. App. - Houston [1st Dist.], 2003, pet ref'd).

On February 25, 2005, Applicant filed this 11.07 application for a writ of habeas corpus in the convicting court. On April 17, 2008, the State filed its original answer and proposed findings of fact and conclusion of law. On July 1, 2008, this 11.07 application was forwarded to this Court.

Applicant raises four allegations in his application which challenges the validity of his conviction and resulting sentence. Although an evidentiary heairng was not held, the trial judge entered findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court recommends that relief be denied.

This Court has reviewed the record with respect to the allegations made by Applicant. We decline to adopt findings Nos. 1 and 2 because they are not supported by the record. We adopt the trial court's remaining findings of fact and conclusions of law. Based upon the trial court's findings and our own review, the relief sought is denied.

It is so ordered on this the 26th day of November, 2008.



Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goldberg v. State
95 S.W.3d 345 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Goldberg, Dror Haim, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldberg-dror-haim-texcrimapp-2008.