Goldbas v. Hobaica
190 A.D.2d 1095
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 5, 1993
StatusPublished
This text of 190 A.D.2d 1095 (Goldbas v. Hobaica) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Goldbas v. Hobaica, 190 A.D.2d 1095 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).
Opinion
— Order unanimously affirmed with costs (see, Kusak v Allstate Ins. Co., 190 AD2d 1050 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Oneida County, Tenney, J. — Amended Answer.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Lawton, Fallon and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kusak v. Allstate Insurance
190 A.D.2d 1050 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
190 A.D.2d 1095, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goldbas-v-hobaica-nyappdiv-1993.